Douglas Kennedy is seeking to dismiss the charges against him in connection , his attorney announced at a Thursday Mount Kisco court appearance.
His counsel also issued a subpoena demanding records and details from the hospital in connection with the incident, the hospital's investigation of it and its policies. The request was filed on April 9.
The Westchester County District Attorney's office and the hospital, however, are seeking to quash the subpoena. Kennedy's atttorney, Robert Gottlieb, in response, told Village Justice John Donohue that the prosecution has no legal standing to do so. A prosecutor responded that it is within their right to oppose.
Responding, Gottlieb blasted the attempt to quash as delaying the receipt of "properly obtainable documents from the hospital."
After hearing the arguments Donohue laid out a series of procedural dates that will run before June 14, when he will make a decision on the dismissal request. He gave the prosecution until April 26 to reply to the defendent's filing from this week, May 10 for Kennedy's legal counterreply, and May 17 for a counterreply from the prosecution in turn.
The June 14 date will include another court appearance, this time at 2 p.m.
Gottlieb is also seeking for exculpatory information to be turned over from the district attorney.
Kennedy is charged with endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor, and harassment, a violation. The later is not a crime.
After they walked out, Kennedy and his wife, Molly, held a press conference and defended his actions during the Jan. 7 dispute with hospital nurses Cari Luciano and Anna Lane. The nurses accuse him of injuring them during a scuffle in which an attempt was made to retrieve Bo.
Talking with reporters, Kennedy explained that the loss of his father—alluding to the 1968 assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy—is what makes him appreciate being with his son.
He vehemently defended how he handled his son.
“I want to tell people that it is okay for a father to hold his son in his arms, and it is ok for a father to want to be with his newborn baby," he said.
“The only thing I wanted to do that night was to be with my son and to hold him in my arms," he added.
About the safety of carrying the baby, he said: “I do not think a father holding a son is dangerous. In fact, I think the safest place my son can be is in my arms.”
Gottlieb took over the press conference after the couple departed, and fielded a barrage of questions, some of which came with skepticism of his arguments about the incident and included whether assault was committed in the scuffle.
“There’s no assault. He was not even charged with assault. There was no crime here.”
When asked if a plea deal has been offered, Gottlieb replied that none has been.
"There’s nothing to plead to," he replied.
If the motion to dismiss is denied, Gottlieb stated that they are ready to have a trial.
“The truth is going to be heard in the courtroom. The facts will all come out.”
Gottlieb also accused Lane and Luciano of being out for money and lining their pockets. He claimed that in January a lawyer representing them sent a letter demanding that it be sent to an insurance carrier.
Before the court appearance began, a group of nurses from the New York State Nurses Association spoke out against Kennedy outside of the courthouse. They stated that nurses who have people taking their babies out without authorization could be held responsible if something happens, possibly getting fired.
When asked by a reporter who was posing a question from Kennedy's viewpoint about why he should not be allowed to take his baby out, DeBorah Briston, a nurse at Westchester Medical Center in Valhalla, stated that a baby is still under their care before discharge and permission was not granted.
Another theme that arose Thursday, which comes up in press coverage of legal troubles involving prominent people, is Kennedy's name and status.
A nurse present at the group's press conference felt that that someone else other than Kennedy been involved, the charge would be more severe, like a felony.
Regardless of Kennedy, Gottlieb argued that nobody deserves to be hauled through the process the way he has.
The court and prosecution appeared to adjust their normal routines in connection to the case.
The change could be felt in small ways, ranging from a more restrictive seating policy for the press, to an earlier start for the court. The district attorney also had a group from the office present at the prosecution's podium, in contrast to the sole official who normally handles misdemeanor complaints in village court.
For our previous coverage of the Douglas Kennedy charges, click here.
The answer is simple - if Kennedy didn't want to follow the rules, he didn't have to deliver at that hospital. Lord knows with his resources he could have found someplace else for his wife to deliver.
No one is saying that we're glad his father was killed - it's awful. But it's also no excuse for acting like a mad man because the nurses advised you that you can't take the baby outside until you're discharged in, what, 24 hours? It's not like they were holding the baby there for weeks. The guy could have waited a day.
Mr Kennedy's actions are typical of the Kennedy's. Above the law.
Remember Francis, rules should never be allowed to over rule common sense. If the nurses exhibited a little common sense none of this would have happened.
The "rules" including no smoking, visiting hours, removing a patient from the ward and exposing the patient to other bacteria/virus and then bringing those germs back to the maternity ward are in place for everyone.
Secondly, if the hospital would have denied the Kennedy infant re-entry into the maternity ward after he removed the infant, can you imagine the firestorm his lawyers would have started? When you sign into a hospital the rules are in black and white on the documents that you sign. Kennedy over reacted and escalated the incident once he was told no and make no mistake, he was told no before it turned violent. He showed amazingly poor judgement to assume he was "entitled" to leave the ward with the infant and should have accepted that fact instead of pushing his way out of the place with an infant in his arms. If he so desired he could have put the baby back in the crib and signed the baby and the mother out and taken them home at any time like a civilized person. Kennedy is the perpetrator, not the victim, simple as that.
above the law. Stop desecrating the Kennedy name and behave like a law abiding citizen. If you find that possible.
This is a very big deal and could establish a precedent which could throw our hospitals in a cahotic state.
was attempting to leave the hospital which is against hospital rules until they are properly dischrged or sign out against Medical Advice. Mr.. Kennedy was not attacked by hospital emloyees. It was Mr Kennedy who attacked the hospital employees. Disgusting behavior by a supposedly well bred individual. Mr. Kennedy's behavior was irrational and so is your thinking on this matter. What person who is not irrational would refer to a hospitals employees as "prison employees." Even Golf Clubs have rules which a gentlemen golfer must adhere to, as do hospitals and other facilities The emphasis is on gentelmen & rational. Neither of which seem to apply to either you or Mr. Kennedy.
I am not a nurse. However, I was born in a hospital as was my son. We were properly admitted and properly discharged. We also thanked the hospital staff for their excellent care. Naturally, my good manners, common sense and obedience to laws and rules are all well in tact. Try it sometime it works better then having to go to court over bad behavior.
why it is not appropriate.