Planning Board Skeptical of Chappaqua Crossing Grocery Zone

Board members support allowing for smaller grocery store space. Competition with existing hamlets, traffic, among issues of interest.

At their Tuesday work session, New Castle Planning Board members made it clear that they have concerns with the Town Board's proposal to rezone Chappaqua Crossing to allow for a large supermarket and ancillary retail.

Prominent among the concerns is a requirement for having a large supermarket in the zone, which must range from 50,000 to 60,000 square feet in size. 

“I think it would be unlikely that our local population would generate the kind of revenue for a grocery store of 50,000 square feet, the kind of revenue that would be necessary for a grocery store of that size to stay in business," said board member Sheila Crespi, who wanted to know more about the clientele for such a supermarket.

Fellow board member Douglas Schuerman asked why can't demand from the market dictate square footage, noting that there are stores that use less than 50,000.

“So why the minimum amount?” he asked.

Board Chairman Richard Brownell was sympathetic to the concern, saying he think it's a "fundamental question" that they have.

In contrast, it was noted that the former D'Agostino in Chappaqua, which closed last year, was less than 15,000 square feet. One of the closest supermarkets which a size comparable to the proposal, it was explained is the Mount Kisco A&P, which comes in at 50,000 square feet.

At the meeting, board members also questioned the Town Board's rationale, placed in the draft copy of the rezoning legislation, stating that the retail can help a town that is underserved.

“I don’t really see us as an underserved market area," she said.

Brownell agreed, saying text needs to be re-worded.

Board members also had sentiments that the wording for maximum square footage on the site is not clear enough. Theoretically, according to planning consultant Joanne Meder, the proposed retail overlay district - it would only go in Chappaqua Crossing's existing commercial zone - could accomodate up to 165,000 square feet of space. This is because the Town Board would have to authority to allow for up to 25 percent of the underlying commercial district's square footage to be devoted to the retail zone. Meder's number is assuming a total square footage of 662,000. Site owner Summit/Greenfield, in its most recent mixed-use residential/commercial proposal, called for retaining that amount out of the existing 700,000, with some space being demolished.

Board members discussed the potential for the site to compete with existing merchants in the downtowns of Chappaqua and Millwood.

“I feel that this is introducing a third commercial center into New Castle, which is something that the master plan didn’t anticipate, and I know that part of this process would be amending the master plan," said board member Sheila Crespi. She felt that consideration such a change should include broad community input with events such as visioning sessions.

Others questioned the potential mix of tenants that would come.

“It’s like a Woodbury Commons," said Schuerman, referencing the large Orange County development.

Board member Gerrard Curran, referring to the possible mix, said he gets the sense that "it’s more like a strip mall.” Responding, Brownell said they have to be clear that they do not want a strip mall. Rather, they want buildings in the zone that will conform to the same architecture as existing buildings on the site.

The board members' questions are not much different from those of residents who came to a Sept. 24 public hearing held by the Town Board. At it, they blasted the proposal, arguing that it will have a harmful traffic impact, lead to the creation of a strip mall and create unfair competition with existing businesses.

Meanwhile, Summit/Greenfield has announced that it will soon present a new plan that takes into account the Town Board's rezoning proposal. 

At the meeting, Brownell asked Town Planner Sabrina Charney Hull for an update on the Town Board's interest in overhauling the master plan, which last received a major update in 1989. She replied that Westchester County's Department of Planning has been in talks with the town to work on developing base documents for the process. She also said an expedition of the master plan review for its commercial part is being looked it.

In terms of procedure, Crespi called for there to be a thorough review of the proposal, possibly with an environmental impact statement, to look at the potential impacts of traffic, the market area for such a destination and what kind of stores would have use of ancillary space that, under the rezoning, must be at least 5,000 square feet each.

The proposed rezoning legislation, which merely creates the process for establishing the zone, calls for having the Town Board to review a rezoning application and approve what is called a preliminary development concept plan. The Planning Board would then decide whether to grant site plan approval for the application. 

“But once it’s on the books the pressure is there to move forward on something," she said.

Fellow board members agreed that there should be more review, particular traffic. Meanwhile, Lester Steinman, a land use attorney for the town, told the board that the Town Board will have to go through an environmental review, but also explained that the scope of what is to be done in consideration is not yet known.

Other questions included the placement of retail signage, including street-side, and adequacy of parking.

The debate over rezoning the site for retail is the latest in a saga at the property that has lasted for nearly eight years. The developer, which bought the property from Reader's Digest in 2004 and spent years in the mid-late 2000s trying to build condos and townhouses on the site, got Town Board rezoning approval in 2011 for 111 out of the 199 units it proposed. Summit/Greenfield took the town to state and federal courts over how the review was handled. The state lawsuit was just dismissed, while the federal case is still ongoing.

The Planning Board will have another discussion on the proposal at its Oct. 16 meeting, with a feedback memo in place before the Town Board reconvenes a public hearing on the proposal on Oct. 30.

Chappmom October 03, 2012 at 06:49 PM
Armonk Square is under construction-it will house a supermarket. The community needed-wanted it and the town of Armonk responded. Good thing no NIMBY Bassetts lived their. DAGS prices were too high but for many basic family items that it served the needs of many- deli counter, beverage aisle, paper goods, cereal, produce, frozen food aisle, baby food, diapers, etc. Village Market doesn’t have this ,not the selection, and while expensive, DAGS was cheaper than VM on most items.. Your position is obvious as stated in your postings. You wrote about the "development" at Chapp Crossing. I see no development -NONE. You want a master plan - you offer NONE. You want a "study". We dont need a study to prove that our community , deserves and needs a grocery store/supermarket. I work part time in Rye so going to Millwood to shop and then pick up my kids is not possible. Our downtown merchants will be better not worse once we build retail in Chapp Crossing. I am one of many that shops elsewhere because of lack of grocery store. I would stay local and make the easy drive from Chapp Crossing to downtown. But not from Mt Kisco. Chapp has multiple nail salons, multiple real estate brokers, multiple banks, multiple restaurants, cafes, coffee shops. They are in close proximity to one another -NEWSFLASH - an ice cream yogurt shop is soon to open in Chapp - it will compete with Local and Sherry B. You really think retail at Chapp Crossing will destroy downtown?
Bassett October 03, 2012 at 07:13 PM
@Chappmom Are Millwood and Pleasantville really that much further than Chapp. Crossing, maybe minutes. We clearly disagree and you seem to enjoy distorting my words, again for your own selfish wishes. You have no way of knowing what this development will do to the downtowns, but your needs come first. Maybe you should ask the merchants in Chappaqua and Millwood how they feel, before you speak on this point. And make sure that you tell them of your hardship.
Chapp Dad October 04, 2012 at 03:08 PM
Bassett - it is you who demonstrate selfish wishes. Many (probably most) people in our town desire a supermarket. We prefer it be in or in close proximity to downtown Chappaqua. Since no location is available downtown and we have a large underutilized commercially zoned tract of land at Chapp Crossing it will be very suitable. YOUR selfish obstructionist NIMBY ramblings only continue the useless and pointless procrastinations that are preventing any use of Chapp Crossing. Your selfish opinion that Chappmom should drive to and shop in Millwood or Pleasantville instead of Mt Kisco illuminates your inconsistency. If you are truly concerned about our downtown Chapp merchants then sending Chappmom to Millwood/Pleasantville takes business from these merchants. She has already told you that she would stay in Chapp to shop should a supermarket be built at Chapp Crossing. You would prefer she drive elsewhere at the expense of the downtown merchants you pretend to care about.
Duff Bailey October 05, 2012 at 11:45 AM
The grocery stores that most people seem to want is Trader Joe's or something like DeCicco's which will open in the Armonk Square. These types of stores run 15 - 25 thousand sq feet and are a great size for a community like ours. If they are located in the downtown (as Armonk Square is) they draw traffic to downtown merchants and add value to the community. I would love to see something like that in our town. What the town Board (not the developer ) has proposed for Chappaqua Crossing is something completely different. Its a massive grocery store in a mall full of box stores. Frankly - its a throw back to the 1980s - when gas was cheap and boomers were buying big cars and moving to far out suburbs.
Bassett October 05, 2012 at 12:08 PM
Finally !!! A factual comment with good sense on this thread. Thank you Duff Bailey.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »