.

New Districts On the Way for Legislature

In part one of an occasional series on state redistricting, we look at redrawn territories, released today, for state senators and Assembly members.

New state legislative districts that reflect population shifts seen in the 2010 census were released today.

The maps are published on the website of a legislative task force that drew the new district boundaries. Guided by population data, and likely a welter of political considerations, the bipartisan task force—its members selected by the Legislature’s divided leadership—has defined a new state political map in time for November’s elections. Those maps now go to the Assembly and State Senate for a vote. After that, they would go to the governor for a signature or veto, which has been threatened in the event of obvious gerrymandering.  

Though its work could influence electoral politics for at least the next decade, the task force toiled in secret, deciding behind closed doors on revised shapes and locations for the state’s 150 Assembly districts and, in a one-seat increase, 63 State Senate districts.   

With few New Yorkers able to identify the districts in which they live, let alone name their state senator or assemblyman, immediate interest in the maps will likely be limited, largely confined to officeholders, those who would displace them and the entourage of both. Within that realm, however, the decennial districting process seems inevitably to attract controversy. This time around, it has been especially contentious, drawing complaints from insiders like Gov. Andrew Cuomo and former New York City Mayor Edward I. Koch, who want an independent—a nonpartisan rather than bipartisan—panel to draw the lines, and Common Cause, which has already drawn its own proposed districts.

In the end, said one Westchester politician, “The courts will probably have the final say.” A veteran of the county’s back rooms, he said it’s unlikely that districts drawn by any of the oft-mentioned mapmakers—the Legislature, the governor or an independent commission—would escape a legal challenge or two. “That’ll leave it to a judge to decide what the maps look like,” he said.

None of this political churn is provoked by the ostensible reason for remapped districts—the need to keep them roughly equal in population—but instead by how they place “different sets of voters together in new ways,” as the Brennan Center for Justice puts it.

“The way that voters are grouped into districts . . . has an enormous influence on who our representatives are, and what policies they fight for,” the public-policy body says in a study of redistricting.

Over the years, political strategists have jockeyed to leverage a district’s demographic data, combining or dividing ethnic, racial, religious and other concentrations to enhance their voting power, or minimize their strength.

In the practical politics of Albany, where Democrats overwhelmingly control the Assembly and Republicans have an edge in the Senate, party leaders typically strike deals on districting deals. This year, however, Cuomo has vowed to veto any maps that obviously exploit partisan differences or advantages

Today’s maps are advisory-only. In that sense, the bipartisan commission that drafted them— the Legislative Advisory Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment—functions as a legislative committee, reporting its work product to the full chamber for ultimate disposition.

LATFOR, as the commission is known in Albany, comprises two state senators, two Assembly members and two non-legislators, all of them appointed by the political leadership of the Legislature’s two houses.

 

NEXT: Congressional maps, cutting New York’s representatives from 29 to 27, are coming next.    

Paul Feiner January 27, 2012 at 12:28 AM
I find it outrageous that the NYS Senate Republicans are planning to INCREASE the number of State Senators from 62 members to 63. In these difficult economic times, when lawmakers at every level of government are laying off employees and cutting services--there is no need for the Republicans in the Senate to insist on increasing the number of lawmakers. The taxpayer dollars used to fund an additional office holder and staff (hundreds of thousands of dollars...perhaps millions) could be put to much better use. Instead of creating a new position that is not needed--Albany lawmakers should consider doing what Nebraska did: they have a unicameral legislature. NY would be better served with a one house legislature, with fewer lawmakers. FINALLY- GREG BALL claims he is a conservative lawmaker. Will he support the creation of a new unnecessary elected position? PAUL FEINER Greenburgh Town Supervisor
Bob Zahm January 27, 2012 at 02:13 AM
Or maybe not. Aren't they just trying to prevent the possibility of re-creating the 50/50 splits that have happened recently? Of course, they could have gone down a different path to get to the same place; e.g., reduce 1 senatorial seat. Can you think of any volunteers?
Mike January 27, 2012 at 01:28 PM
He finds this outrageous? What about the fact that the smallest county in NYS (Rockland) has multiple Congress people and state representatives. For those in Dem party to feign outrage over this is very disingenuous
Kristoff Lukas January 27, 2012 at 06:04 PM
The disingenuous political issue is the consistent deception that any elected official on either party can come in and reform the dysfunctional governments in Albany or locally. Albany is still dysfunctional regardless who is in the drivers seat. Lets not forget how NYS and the U.S. got to this economic crisis, why the TEA Party, Occupy Wall Street or any other American is disenfranchised with our nation. By those who got the country in this crisis. GOVERNMENT. Amazing how the problem keeps trying to resolve the problem!
Mike January 27, 2012 at 06:27 PM
@kritoff- spot on! It is actually very interesting that despite some big differences, the OWS and Tea Party have that one common theme or question- can "government" as currently formed resolve the issues we face. i think the answer is probably not..but what do we do about it is the bigger question
Walt January 27, 2012 at 08:08 PM
Feiner is outraged at the GOP for proposing budget increases during these "difficult economic times"? The town of Greenburgh just raised their taxes almost 6% for 2012. What a hypocrite. http://www.thedailygreenburgh.com/news/budget-2012-passes-despite-controversial-beginning
Francis T McVetty February 06, 2012 at 08:28 PM
Wait, Isn't Feiner one of those who want to make the old Tappan Zee bridge a park walk way? Where is the money coming to do that? I guess there are not "difficult times" for that pet project.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something